fix typo
This commit is contained in:
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ with different filtering options), the actual elapsed time was greater. File I/O
|
|||||||
slightly less time than the simulation itself. Real elapsed time from start to finish was under 30 minutes.
|
slightly less time than the simulation itself. Real elapsed time from start to finish was under 30 minutes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As mentioned in the theory section, performance could be improved by implementing a more efficient algorithm for finding
|
As mentioned in the theory section, performance could be improved by implementing a more efficient algorithm for finding
|
||||||
the maximum weighted matching.
|
the maximum weight matching.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## BEHAVIOR WITH RANDOMIZED WELL POPULATIONS
|
## BEHAVIOR WITH RANDOMIZED WELL POPULATIONS
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ public class Simulator implements GraphModificationFunctions {
|
|||||||
if(verbose){System.out.println("Edges between vertices of with excessively different occupancy values " +
|
if(verbose){System.out.println("Edges between vertices of with excessively different occupancy values " +
|
||||||
"removed");}
|
"removed");}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
//Find Maximum Weighted Matching
|
//Find Maximum Weight Matching
|
||||||
//using jheaps library class PairingHeap for improved efficiency
|
//using jheaps library class PairingHeap for improved efficiency
|
||||||
if(verbose){System.out.println("Finding maximum weighted matching");}
|
if(verbose){System.out.println("Finding maximum weight matching");}
|
||||||
MaximumWeightBipartiteMatching maxWeightMatching;
|
MaximumWeightBipartiteMatching maxWeightMatching;
|
||||||
//Use correct heap type for priority queue
|
//Use correct heap type for priority queue
|
||||||
String heapType = BiGpairSEQ.getPriorityQueueHeapType();
|
String heapType = BiGpairSEQ.getPriorityQueueHeapType();
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user